Gifted and Talented Education in New York City

References and Works Cited

  1. Baudson, T. G., & Preckel, F. (2013). Teachers' implicit personality theories about the gifted: An experimental approach. School Psychology Quarterly : The Official Journal of the Division of School Psychology, American Psychological Association, 28(1), 37-46. 10.1037/spq0000011 Retrieved from
  2. Bear, G., Minke, K., & Thomas, A. (1997). Children's needs II : Development, problems, and alternatives. United States: Retrieved from
  3. Berlin, J. E. (2009). It' s all a matter of perspective: Student perceptions on the impact of being labeled gifted and talented. Roeper Review, 31(4), 217. 10.1080/02783190903177580
  4. A brief history of gifted and talented education. Retrieved from
  5. Brody, L. (2018, Oct. 3,). Some parents pay up to $400 an hour to prep 4-year-olds for NYC’s gifted test. Wall Street Journal Retrieved from
  6. Card, D., & Giuliano, L. (2015). Can universal screening increase the representation of low
  7. income and minority students in gifted education? NBER Working Paper Series.
  8. Carolyn E Welch. (2016). New legislation creates opportunities for parent advocates. Parenting for High Potential, 5(2), 3. Retrieved from
  9. Childers, D. M., Sr. (2009). The academic community's perceptions of gifted education Available from Dissertations & Theses @ University of Phoenix. Retrieved from
  10. Colangelo, N., Assouline, S., & Gross, Miraca, Education, Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences, UNSW. (2004). A nation deceived: How schools hold back america's brightest studentsPublisher:Belin-Blank Center for Gifted Education. Retrieved from
  11. Cookson, P. W., & Shroff, S. (1997). School choice and urban school reform
  12. Cynthia V. Ward. (2005). Giftedness, disadvantage, and law. Journal of Education Finance, 31(1), 45-64. Retrieved from
  13. Feinberg, W., & Lubienski, C. (2008). School choice policies and outcomes.
  14. Fontaine, C., & Dave, K. (2018). Spectrum of trust in data: New york city parents navigating school choice. Data Society. Retrieved from
  15. Gifted and talented. Retrieved from
  16. Hopkins, A., & Garrett, K. (2010). Separate and unequal: The underrepresentation of african american students in gifted and talented programs. Black History Bulletin, 73(1), 24. Retrieved from
  17. Howley, A., Howley, C. B., & Pendarvis, E. D. (1986). Teaching gifted children. Boston, Mass. u.a: Little, Brown. Retrieved from
  18. Jolly, J. L., & Kettler, T. (2008). Gifted education research 1994–2003: A disconnect between priorities and practice. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 31(4), 427-446. 10.4219/jeg-2008-792 Retrieved from
  19. Koshy, V., Smith, C. P., & Brown, J. (2017). Parenting ‘gifted and talented’ children in urban areas. Gifted Education International, 33(1), 3-17. 10.1177/0261429414535426 Retrieved from
  20. LeBlanc, K. (2007). Principals' perceptions of no child left behind's impact on the education of gifted and talented students Available from Dissertations & Theses @ University of Northern Colorado. Retrieved from
  21. Lee, D., Coladarci, T., & Donaldson, G. A. J. (1996). Effects of school choice on academic commitment and academic achievement. Retrieved from CrossRef
  22. Lu, Y., & Weinberg, S. L. (2016). Public pre-K and test taking for the NYC gifted-and-talented programs. Educational Researcher, 45(1), 36-47. 10.3102/0013189X16633441 Retrieved from
  23. Margolin, L. (1996). A pedagogy of privilege. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19(2), 164-180. 10.1177/016235329601900204 Retrieved from
  24. McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (2007). What predicts teachers' attitudes toward the gifted? Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(3), 246-254. 10.1177/0016986207302719 Retrieved from
  25. McGee, C. D.Time to face the need for advocacy. Parent to Parent, 18.
  26. Michael-Chadwell, S. (2011). Examining the underrepresentation of underserved students in gifted programs from a transformational leadership vantage point. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34(1), 99-130. 10.1177/016235321003400105 Retrieved from
  27. MILLER, P. F. (1981). Educational policies and state characteristics influencing state response to gifted and talented education between 1977 and 1980 Retrieved from
  28. Mitchell, P. B. (1994). State policy issues in the education of gifted and talented students. United States:
  29. Neihart, M., Reis, S. M., Robinson, N. M., & Moon, S. (2002). Social and emotional development of gifted children : What do we know? Prufrock Press. Retrieved from
  30. Perry-Levy, S. T. (2016). The perspectives of successful teachers in the identification of culturally diverse students for the gifted and talented education program Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Full Text: The Humanities and Social Sciences Collection. Retrieved from
  31. Rachana Bhatt. (2011). A review of gifted and talented education in the united states. Education Finance and Policy, 6(4), 557-582. 10.1162/EDFP_a_00048 Retrieved from
  32. Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60(3), 180.
  33. Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (2002). What is Schoolwide Enrichment: How Gifted Programs Relate to Total School Improvement. Gifted Child Today, 25(4), 18-64.
  34. Reinhard, J. J. (2016). From knowledge to practice: A gifted educator's journey Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Full Text: The Humanities and Social Sciences Collection. Retrieved from
  35. Reis, S., Gentry, M., & Park, S. (1995). Extending the pedagogy of gifted education to all students.
  36. Robson, C. (2005). Students with disabilities, learning difficulties and disadvantages: Statistics and indicators OECD: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Retrieved from
  37. Roda, A. (2017). Parenting in the age of high-stakes testing: Gifted and talented admissions and the meaning of parenthood. Teacher's College Record, 119(9), 1-54.
  38. Ross, P. O. (1993). National excellence: A case for developing america's talent. (). Washington, DC.
  39. St. Clair, K. L. (1989). Counseling gifted students: A historical review. Roeper Review, 12(2), 98-102. 10.1080/02783198909553244 Retrieved from
  40. Stephens, K. R. (2018). Policy, legal issues, and trends in the education of gifted students. APA handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 531-544). US: American Psychological Association.10.1037/0000038-034 Retrieved from
  41. United States. Congress. House. Committee on Education and Labor. Subcommittee on Elementary, Secondary, and Vocational Education. (1987). Gifted and talented children's education act : Hearing before the subcommittee on elementary, secondary, and vocational education of the committee on education and labor, house of representatives, ninety-ninth congress, second session on H.R. 3263 and H.R. 2364, hearing held in washington, DC, may 6, 1986 Retrieved from
  42. VanTassel-Baska, J. (2010). The history of urban gifted education. Gifted Child Today, 33(4), 18-27. Retrieved from
  43. Wiskow, K., Fowler, V. D., & Christopher, M. M. (2011). Active advocacy: Working together for appropriate services for gifted learners. Gifted Child Today, 34(2), 20-25. 10.1177/107621751103400207 Retrieved from
  44. Wylie, A. D. (2011). A qualitative study: The affects of the no child left behind act on gifted and talented students Available from Dissertations & Theses @ University of Phoenix. Retrieved from
  45. Young, M. H., & Balli, S. J. (2014). Gifted and talented education (GATE). Gifted Child Today, 37(4), 236-246. 10.1177/1076217514544030 Retrieved from